The origin of this term, applied to Maj. Gen. William T. Sherman’s foragers during the March To The Sea and the Carolinas Campaign, is obscure but was common army parlance by 1864. Possibly deriving from the German Bummler, meaning “idler” or “wastrel,” the name was embraced by many soldiers, who believed it struck terror in the hearts of Southern people. The soldiers of the Army of Georgia were authorized to live off the land, since it was Sherman’s intent to “make Georgia howl” and to lay just as heavy a hand on South Carolina, which many Federals considered a “hellhole of secession.” On the road from Atlanta to the sea and then north, Sherman’s columns left their supply bases far behind, and their wagons could not carry provisions sufficient for all. Nevertheless, the Union commander sought to regulate and limit foraging, keeping it within accepted rules of warfare. Each brigade leader was to organize a foraging detail under “discreet officers.” The details were empowered to gather rations and forage of any sort and quantity useful to their commands and could appropriate animals and conveyances without limit. Soldiers, however, were not to trespass on any private dwelling, were to avoid abusive or threatening language, and, when possible, were to leave each family “a reasonable portion [of provisions] for their maintenance.” In regions where the army moved unmolested, no destruction of property was permitted. But where bushwhackers or guerrillas impeded the march, corps commanders were enjoined to “enforce a devastation more or less relentless, according to the measure of hostility.” Many who marched through Georgia and the Carolinas disregarded these prohibitions. Too often, foraging parties became bands of marauders answering to no authority. One conscientious bummer wrote to his sister about the depredations inflicted on South Carolina:
How would you like it, do you think, Ab, to have troops passing your house constantly … ransacking and plundering and carrying off everything that could be of any use to them? There is considerable excitement in foraging, but it is [a] disagreeable business in some respects to go into people’s houses and take their provisions and have the women begging and entreating you to leave a little when you are necessitated to take all. But I feel some degree of consolation in the knowledge I have that I never went beyond my duty to pillage.
Source: Historical Times Encyclopedia of the Civil War
Hi Bummer,
The image of Isabella Fogg published with this excellent post is not one that I’ve seen anywhere else. I’d like to know where you found it so that I may contact the organization or individual to seek permission for a book project that I am working on.
Thanks in advance for any help you can offer.
Ron
I just finished a book “Sherman Fierce Patriot. His life from Lancaster Oh to St Louis with California and Atlanta in the mix. The author has quite a lot on the Bummers. Both the importance of foraging and the effects, good and bad. He mentioned that some bummers would dress in costumes for effect. Certainly the fact that Sherman turned his army into a very light weight fast moving force was a factor. The author made a point that although Sherman wanted to make “Georgia howl” and the move into S Carolina turned a bit ugly, he called his troops off at the North Carolina boarder feeling, they deserved better treatment.
Sherman certainly had his own way of thinking and viewing a situation. He was accosted by an angry town mayor in SC for his troops getting drunk and tearing the place up. Sherman replied what mayor in his right mind would leave his city full of whisky with an army on its door step. I cant argue with Sherman on that one.
George
Thanks for the read and insightful comment.Sherman is one of Bummer’s favorite CW Generals. Bummer has read your selection on Sherman and found it a Marvelous read.
Several of Bummer’s recollections here relate Sherman’s quality of honor and character
But also a fine line between genius and INSANITY!
Just stumbled on you site/blog. It started with looking for a good pic of Adam Gurowski. Wanted to insert the pic with commentary in a revised self-published edition I wrote on an incident in the C.W. Perhaps you would like to learn more about that incident I wrote about later.
I enjoyed your article on Adam Gurowski. Although he received all these negative remarks from Washington insiders he couldn’t have been all that bad. If you have checked out his several interesting books now available at archive.org you will gain an Eastern Europeaner’s perspective of their still-feudalistic times and struggles. His liberal views on slavery are heartening that this foreigner should have so much hope in American republican success. For that was what Gurowski was: a republican, and an rabid anti-monarchist (for there were plenty of monarchs and monarchy around in those days who very much didn’t like the fact that republicanism was succeeding in the New World.).
That Gurowski was a real Polish revolutionary in the 1830s gives him some cred. Gurowski’s PanSlav period and book he wrote is of note when he went to Russia (panslavism was OK for the Poles but it was also fearful of westernization and the ‘anarchy’ of democracy; opinions are too messy for the religious devout).
You see, historians have little dealt with the 1863 Polish revolution as it related to Lincoln’s Civil War. And no treatment by historians at all of what Lincoln’s aides likely learned from Gurowski regarding Poland. U.S. Minister Cassius Clay in Russia advised that the Polish rebellion was not a democratic revolution but “an oligarchic and aristocratic uprising of nobles in the interest of the Roman Catholic Church.”
You’re well researched. I’ve got some stuff under by belt too. We should talk some more.
Sterling
Thanks for sharing your take on Gurowski. It opened up several compelling ideas.
Bummer
So what’s the deal? Who are you? What is behind this blog?
Hey Pat
Bummer doesn’t know what deal you’re referring to. My handle is Bummer am not hard to find.The only motivation for this blog is to share some of what has been studied and read over the last fifty years. This “old guy” learns something from people like yourself everyday. There is no hidden agenda on this blog or ulterior motive.This student continues
to study and enjoy you…..Brooks and Kevin daily. Thanks for asking.
Bummer
not suggesting any hidden agenda, just wanted an orientation to your pov.
Pat Young,
Regarding POV. First a little background, not that it’s necessary, but since you were so kind to ask, Bummer was raised in the “Golden State” and spent 60 plus years reaping the benefits of the dynamic growth, that occurred during the 60’s and 70’s. Spent too many years studying nothing of much practical use. Owned and operated several related businesses, some successful and some not, most with a direct tie to the entertainment industry. However, pre-Civil War politics were always a special interest and the younger Bummer read volumes, of the scholars of the time, regarding their political positioning. A natural direction, was The War itself and unique attention was paid to the results of the conflict and how they effected this countries future. The Bummer family includes several wives, the latest, of 30 plus years, five children, three grand children and all five of Bummer’s children are self-sustaining, politically independent adults.
Bummer’s ancestry is from Eastern Tennessee, Missouri and Oklahoma, a grandfather being raised on the Comanche reservation of the Southwestern portion of that Territory. So much of this youngster’s heritage was learned and absorbed from the closeness of this relationship. Most kin were Pro-Union during the Civil War with a few rebels in the woodpile.Bummer is fortunate to have diaries, letters and journals of the Civil War era and relates both oral and written family history in many posts.
Bummer, wife and Lab, Indiana, moved to a small town on the Northern Plains 18 months ago. The pace is so different from California. The local folks are laid back, taking life as it comes and if they are judgemental, they don’t feel a need to share it. Friendly and kind, these common folks know the importance of survival, family and political independence. No visible racial or ethnic bias is evident, they are willing to live and let live.
An up-side of the move, was a close friend, since forever, was terminally ill within several miles and we spent his last days remembering our “trail of tears”. The AIM activist will always be fondly remembered and will miss his counsel.The Lakota icon was instrumental in convincing “this student” to begin sharing the tales of Bummer’s varied heritage.
Having the time and the inclination to study and write is a precious opportunity. Reading and sometimes commenting on Kevin Levin, Brooks Simpson, Andy Hall, Robert Moore, Pat Young and many others is a cherished honor and I hope “this old guy” still has enough time to absorb more of these scholar’s research and knowledge. Every day above ground for a guy like Bummer, is a blessing and thanks for generating a little….Food for Thought.
Bummer
Cool. Thanks. Just wanted to know a little about you.
Pat,
As Paul Harvey use to say, kinda, “and There’s the rest of the story. Thanks for visiting.
Bummer
this was very good, bummer. 10/10 would read again. i applaud your article. -Person who likes your article.